William Shakespeare recognized how compelling ancient feuds were. On that platform he stacked the romance of Romeo and Juliet. For formulas, few get better than that.
No surprise, the feud dating back to 1994 between the Public Relations Society of America [PRSA] and media specialist for the communications industry Jack O'Dwyer is still getting headlines. In PR NEWSER, Tonya Garcia reports that O'Dwyer took the journey from his base in Manhattan-Connecticut to the PRSA Conference in Florida. There, O'Dwyer was barred entrance.
On O'Dwyer's side is the National Press Club, an influential bunch which sponsors its own impressive lunches featuring provocative personalities such as T. Boone Pickens and Ted Turner. Notes Garcia:
" ... the National Press Club has issued a statement saying it was 'disappointed' to learn that O'Dwyer had been banned. With knowledge of the longstanding 'disagreements,' the organization tried to negotiate with the PRSA, but the PRSA wouldn't budge on its position to keep O'Dwyer out."
In addition to the National Press Club, O'Dwyer has a network of supporters spanning generations from Silent to Y. In the public relations industry he has been generous in his coverage of both agencies and solo flyers. Nail a new account? Let O'Dwyer know that and he will give it play. Lost your job and hanging out a shingle? He invests the effort to framing that in a way which does attract business.
In terms of public relations, the PRSA probably made a wrong call in barring this pilgrim to Florida. After all, in this era of social media in which practitioners can be their own effective lobbyists the rationale for trade associations is shaky. Yes, the Power of One.





Journalists are both objective reporters and advocates. Crusading journalism is part of the American culture. If a journalist sees something wrong, he or she will expose it and campaign against it. Journalists use facts in their campaigns. They have every right to express their opinions. All publications have editorial pages for this purpose.
Posted by: Jack O'Dwyer | October 29, 2011 at 09:19 AM
You pose important questions. Perhaps there should be an interactive
mechanism set up through which professionals in PR can voice their point of view
and then have a conversation online with each other.
In a message dated 10/28/2011 9:51:44 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time,
Posted by: Jane Genova | October 28, 2011 at 09:54 AM
Jane, thank you for being gracious with your time in posting my other comment and responding to my inquiries.
As I mentioned, PRSA is trying very hard to move past this. I'm embarrassed to say that I'd not found your blog prior to Mr. O'Dwyer's including it his pitches to editors, as an example of the "broad condemnation" that PRSA’s decision not to grant him press credentials is receiving.
This leads me to two points. First, we knew there would be some criticism of our course of action, but once people see our response (http://ow.ly/7bTP7) and understand our reasons, they are generally supportive.
Second, and perhaps more importantly, I would ask, is it the role of a so-called "objective" journalist to actively advocate and campaign against an organization he/she covers? The Society of Professional Journalist's Code of Ethics (http://www.spj.org/ethicscode.asp) is very clear in this regard; among its tenets is this: "Distinguish between advocacy and news reporting."
Since Mr. O'Dwyer cannot ethically be both advocate and journalist, which is he?
Arthur Yann is PRSA's vice president of public relations.
Posted by: twitter.com/arthury | October 28, 2011 at 09:51 AM
Jack O'Dwyer is a sad old man fighting a battle that was over long ago. If you'd ever been involved in some of his fiction writing about PRSA over the years, you'd understand. If Jack wants to be a journalist, and get the access journalists get to PRSA Conferences that the rest of us pay for, then he should start acting like one. His stories about PRSA over the last four years have three facts right: The name of the organization, the location, and that those of us mentioned in his stories were present. Other than that, it's fiction. He should just save himself the trip - the results would be the same.
Full disclosure: I am a member of PRSA, and Assembly delegate for my local chapter, but am not involved with the national leadership.
It's sad, really, to see someone ruining his professional reputation by his behavior.
Posted by: Debra Bethard-Caplick | October 25, 2011 at 02:26 PM